views
In many cases, an employment gap in a CV is not considered to be that great. To justify that, people add various things. For instance, some might add up a hobby that they took or maybe a skill that they learnt. However, this one woman decided to add the real reason for her employment gap and it has impressed many people on social media. Yugansh Chokra, founder of content marketing company Growthic, took to LinkedIn and shared a CV as he lauded the woman for being so honest. In the CV, you can see that the woman has attributed her employment gap to being a full time home maker. Yes, you read that right.
Also Read: ‘Ek Bomb Hota Hai..’: This One Line ‘Spoiler’ of Oppenheimer Has Desi Twitter in Splits
The woman justified a 13-year by listing her experience as a homemaker and highlighting her valuable skills. Yugansh mentioned how this CV makes her stand out. Taking to LinkedIn, he wrote, “And the reason I love this is because managing a family is a real task, something that can’t be undervalued. Less than 20% of women in India are working in a professional capacity. Gender gaps in housework participation are the largest among couples with children. It’s a real job, you can’t just discount the amount of work someone has to do to manage a family. Thoughts on this type of CV?"
Along with this, he shared an image of the CV. In the image, you can see that the woman has mentioned all the skills that she learnt as a part of being a home maker. Here, have a look for yourself:
Also Read: Videos Show NRI Panic Buying Rice in US As Indian Govt Imposes Ban on Export
The image, since being uploaded, has gone viral. “Managing a household really is a full-time job. It’s great to see this experience being highlighted on a CV," wrote a LinkedIn user. Another person mentioned, “Mentioning Homemaker as an experience is noteworthy and this truly reflects the open mindset of the person to be able to add qualitative value to something which is usually sidelined and considered a minimal task by the society."
What is your take on the same?
Comments
0 comment